The point I was actually making was that back then 16GB was the maximum available RAM, and yet they saw fit to ship the 15 inch - which was the high end machine - with a large amount. I realise that in this respect the company is a victim of its own success in that the larger the growth, the more they need to earn to continue to grow, but I digress… I’m in the fortunate position of not needing to worry about my finances as such, but I am not blind to the struggle of others, nor to the fact that Apple or it’s leadership, are becoming greedier as time goes on. In point of fact I’m merely speaking from a value proposition, which is important to a lot of people, and nobody likes to feel they are being taken advantage of.
For one, I have not ever ordered a base spec model as it would be entirely unsuitable to my needs. You won't hear me complaining if I can't get more than 64 GiB in my name MBP.
#Best ram configuration for mac pro 2013 upgrade#
I've been holding onto my 2017 15" for about twice as long as I usually keep a Mac notebook because I knew this charge was forthcoming and Intel really hasn't moved the needle much to make an upgrade viable. Personally, I'm going to be happy to get a new MBP this year. That said, I don't think there will be any justification for raising the 16" base model price from its current $2,399 level - though the 14" will probably rise in price due to the fact that it's not a high-end 13" replacement, but rather a mini-16" MacBook Pro with all the capabilities of the 16". between the higher cost of the mini-LED panels, cost of retooling, component shortages (and thus higher BoM), and the lower quantity sold in the prosumer model class, Apple will be at least initially seeking to recoup their investment in the new models. ĭon't think there's much chance of that.Now, I will be upgrading the RAM-I always do-because it will make the resale down the road worth the investment, but that's very different from stating that the minimum RAM needs to be 32GB in the 16" M1X because the minimum RAM in the 15" Intel MBP has been 16 GiB for many years. You don't have to buy the minimum option being offered and you should always be aware of costs v need and how it related to your personal ROI.įurthermore, they're switching to a new architecture so your blanket statement about RAM needs doesn't carry. I'll never understand the problem people have with minimums. Otherwise they should knock £200\$200 off the price.
Granted there will be a slight increase in display cost but considering the savings they’ve made in the last 5 years by keeping the same screens launched in 2012 I don’t think that should be a factor. As they’re saving money on the Touch Bar, processor & GPU at the very least. Especially if they are pricing the same as 2020. Supply chain sources indicate that production began ramping up in August.Ĭonsidering the 15 inch MacBook Pro came with a base RAM of 16gb since late 2013 or 2014 I think its about time it was upgraded to 32GB and absolute minimum 512GB SSD as base model. Dylan also claimed that the devices will have smaller bezels and no bottom "MacBook Pro" text and could ship with a new charging brick.īoth models are largely expected to make their debut at Apple's "Unleashed" event, scheduled for 10 a.m.
#Best ram configuration for mac pro 2013 1080p#
The leaker also maintained past claims from other sources, including the forecast that both models will come equipped with a higher-quality 1080p camera. Likely because of that, the leaker says that pricing will be similar on both devices. Earlier on Tuesday, a display analyst said that mini LED is " 100% confirmed" on the new models.Īdditionally, also reiterated claims that both the 14-inch and 16-inch MacBook Pro model would have the same M1X chipset with equivalent speeds across the lineup. The leaker says that both the 14-inch MacBook Pro and 16-inch MacBook Pro will feature a mini-LED display, echoing rumors and reports that have surfaced in 2021.
0 kommentar(er)
